Has America Waved Goodbye?

Peter Hitchens has a great piece from a Brit’s perspective on the Obama frenzy and the most likely outcome of the the upcoming “change”. Excerpts below:

Anyone would think we had just elected a hip, skinny and youthful replacement for God, with a plan to modernise Heaven and Hell – or that at the very least John Lennon had come back from the dead.

The swooning frenzy over the choice of Barack Obama as President of the United States must be one of the most absurd waves of self-deception and swirling fantasy ever to sweep through an advanced civilisation. At least Mandela-worship – its nearest equivalent – is focused on a man who actually did something.

I really don’t see how the Obama devotees can ever in future mock the Moonies, the Scientologists or people who claim to have been abducted in flying saucers. This is a cult like the one which grew up around Princess Diana, bereft of reason and hostile to facts…

Just look at his sermon by the shores of Lake Michigan. He really did talk about a ‘new dawn’, and a ‘timeless creed’ (which was ‘yes, we can’). He proclaimed that ‘change has come’. He revealed that, despite having edited the Harvard Law Review, he doesn’t know what ‘enormity’ means. He reached depths of oratorical drivel never even plumbed by our own Mr Blair, burbling about putting our hands on the arc of history (or was it the ark of history?) and bending it once more toward the hope of a better day (Don’t try this at home).

I am not making this up. No wonder that awful old hack Jesse Jackson sobbed as he watched. How he must wish he, too, could get away with this sort of stuff.

And it was interesting how the President-elect failed to lift his admiring audience by repeated – but rather hesitant – invocations of the brainless slogan he was forced by his minders to adopt against his will – ‘Yes, we can’. They were supposed to thunder ‘Yes, we can!’ back at him, but they just wouldn’t join in.  No wonder. Yes we can what exactly? Go home and keep a close eye on the tax rate, is my advice. He’d have been better off bursting into ‘I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony’ which contains roughly the same message and might have attracted some valuable commercial sponsorship…

The United States, having for the most part a deeply conservative people, had until now just about stood out against many of the mistakes which have ruined so much of the rest of the world.

Suspicious of welfare addiction, feeble justice and high taxes, totally committed to preserving its own national sovereignty, unabashedly Christian in a world part secular and part Muslim, suspicious of the Great Global Warming panic, it was unique.

These strengths had been fading for some time, mainly due to poorly controlled mass immigration and to the march of political correctness. They had also been weakened by the failure of America’s conservative party – the Republicans – to fight on the cultural and moral fronts.

They preferred to posture on the world stage. Scared of confronting Left-wing teachers and sexual revolutionaries at home, they could order soldiers to be brave on their behalf in far-off deserts. And now the US, like Britain before it, has begun the long slow descent into the Third World. How sad. Where now is our last best hope on Earth?

Sec. of Transportation Ignorant About Auto Industry

Csaba Csere had an excellent column back in July.  Unfortunately C&D is much slower posting their columns than their reviews online – and I am much too lazy busy to re-type it myself.  However it is now up for general viewing and is even more pertinant given the current Auto Industry problems being eyed for government intervention.

I always thought April Fools’ Day came on the first of that month and Earth Day on the 22nd, but apparently, this year those dates were swapped. How else to explain the proposal, on April 22, of Mary E. Peters, the U.S. Secretary of Transportation, to accelerate by 25 percent the CAFE increases that Congress enacted last year?

With gasoline pushing four bucks a gallon, it’s not that I would mind seeing average fuel economy rise to 35.7 mpg for cars and 28.6 mpg for trucks by 2015, as Secretary Peters proposes. I’d also like to see a big, happy parade of Sunni, Shiites, and Kurds marching merrily together down Yafa Street in Baghdad. Plus, I’d like to see an eight-figure balance on my brokerage statement and Kelly Brook delivering UPS packages to our office. Sadly, none of these events is any more likely than Secretary Peters’s delusions about CAFE.

Now if you come away from this article dogging old G.W.’s administration (or even blanket Republicans) you are completely missing the bigger point.  This is not a W. is stupid problem – this is a general problem with allowing (trusting?) politicians to fix (meddle?) in problems that they truly know nothing about.  Government can give nudges here and there in attempting to direct the market.  BUT economic forces and moreso laws of physics can not be overcome by legislation – no matter how much you will it to happen, nor how pure your intentions.

A perfect example for this would be the legislation that was passed in the hopes to make home ownership “affordable” to those that couldn’t afford it.  Result? Well it took a while to come home to roost but the noble plan cost us all 700 billion dollars and counting.  Remember that as government promises to solve the next problem with a wave of its legistative hand – or rushes aid those in need.

Biden: World Will Generate Crisis To Test Obama

In what is often called political stupidity VP nominee Joe Biden had a fit of honesty at a recent fund raising rally:

“Mark my words,” the Democratic vice presidential nominee warned at the second of his two Seattle fundraisers Sunday. “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy… I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it might originate,” Biden said to Emerald City supporters, mentioning the Middle East and Russia as possibilities…”

Why test Obama? I dismiss the “young” theories, but he is extremely inexperienced and all over the map on his foreign policy (half the time we’re unsure he’s aware which nations are currently our allies).  Now the trend amidst his wide array of FP comments seem to be more talking with our current enemies, distancing ourselves from our allies, and pulling back our military as much as possible.  Which could be why the Military support McCain over Obama 68 to 23.  Sen. Biden went on to say:

And the kind of help he’s gonna need is, he’s gonna need you – not financially to help him – we’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.”

…Senate Foreign Relations chairman said of Obama. “This guy has it. But he’s gonna need your help. Because I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, ‘Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is this thing so tough?’

Wait, so we’re going to make tough decisions to respond in foreign affairs in unpopular ways… but we need to do it because in the long run its a good idea??? For a party that claims to hate G. W. Bush above all else, you could swear VP Nominee Joe Biden was channeling him.

Republican Giuliani responded to Biden on Rush Limbaugh’s radio program:

GIULIANI:  My reaction is, maybe we could elect a president that will not tempt the world to test them because of their inexperience.  If Joe Biden is suggesting this, it seems to me that we could elect someone more like Ronald Reagan, who has experience, who the rest of the world has a pretty good idea how he would react and what he would do in the way he would defend America.  I can’t imagine why Joe Biden would want to raise this, but since he’s raised it, it seems to me we should answer…

GIULIANI:  I find the remark very puzzling.  And exactly why he did it and what motivated it only Joe Biden can explain.  I do know that if he’s predicting that the president he’s supporting is going to somehow motivate an attack on the United States, it would seem to me he’s doing it for a reason.  I guess the reason is, the lack of experience that Senator Obama has.  I think he went on to say, “Watch, we’re going to have an international crisis, a generated crisis to test the mettle of this guy.”

GIULIANI:  Well, I think it would be far better off to have a president that wouldn’t tempt people to want to test his mettle the way Joe Biden is talking about, and it is true that at least history records that that’s what happened with John Kennedy, that Khrushchev tested him and believed that he was flaunting and then went ahead and Cuban missile crisis, other things happened.  But that didn’t happen with Ronald Reagan.  No one tested John Kerry’s mettle.  In fact, they released the hostages as he was being sworn in as president of the United States, if I recall correctly.

RUSH:  Mr. Giuliani, do you realize how many times Bill Clinton was tested by Al-Qaeda, starting in 1993 through Mogadishu to the USS Cole, and every time Clinton was tested, he failed, and that’s why they tested Bush on 9/11… And we haven’t been hit since.

GIULIANI:  I think if we had raised this, there would be all kinds of criticisms that we were trying to frighten people.  But it seems to me that Joe Biden has raised it, and it is a very good point to just ask, well, is there a way to avoid this testing, and maybe if we elect someone with the kind of experience and background that John McCain has, no one knows exactly what’s going to happen, but don’t we give ourselves a better chance as we did with Ronald Reagan, we can avoid this?

RUSH:  Well, look, I agree. I think by definition he was saying there would not be an attack if McCain was elected.

GIULIANI:  I am not sure.  I think we’re going to have to ask Joe Biden this.  But, you know, typical of when Joe does something like this, makes one of these comments, they then hide him for about a week and nobody can get to him to find out what he means. – Transcript Rush Limbaugh

Rudy was certainly right about one thing, Biden hasn’t been seen or heard since this story broke.

Al Gore Was Wrong: Ice Caps Growing Not Melting

“In mid-June, I was surprised to see snow still at sea level in Prince William Sound,” said U.S. Geological Survey glaciologist Bruce Molnia. “On the Juneau Icefield, there was still 20 feet of new snow on the surface of the Taku Glacier in late July. At Bering Glacier, a landslide I am studying, located at about 1,500 feet elevation, did not become snow free until early August.

“In general, the weather this summer was the worst [coldest/snowiest] I have seen in at least 20 years.”

Never before in the history of a research project dating back to 1946 had the Juneau Icefield witnessed the kind of snow buildup that came this year. It was similar on a lot of other glaciers too.

Whew. Crisis averted.  And none too soon since “carbon taxes” would only drive the economy lower.  Thanks to China and India global CO2 emissions are way up in spite of guilt-ridden Americans’ trying new light bulbs and other token fixes.

For most of us, this news is quite stunning, considering that the former VP had both invented the modern day internet AND had the backing of many Hollywood heavy-weights.  Meteorologists, however, were less surprised.

The Question That Destroyed A Campaign

Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher has shot onto the national scene and captured (threatened?) an election with a simple question.  Before you believe all the hype in the chopped up videos from both sides you should check out the full video for yourself (it should be around 5 minutes).

Two significant issues have emerged from the now famous meeting with Joe.  First -most importantly- is how it highlights Obama’s tax plan.  Second, is the aftermath reaction to the now famous socialist slip.

OBAMA: …If your revenue is above 250…

The majority of people are missing the fact that Obama is talking about small business REVENUE not profit. Total sales before you pay your employees, rent, materials cost, etc… NOT the cash going into your pocket as the owner after you’ve paid all your bills.  I keep hearing people talk about $250k paychecks of these owners when that’s not what he’s talking about at all.  Just looking at the payroll expenses of a mom and pop whatever with more than 5-8 employees and you quickly exceed 250k.

OBAMA: …95% of small businesses make less than 250

Obama claims 95% of Small Biz will be unaffected (he really likes to reuse numbers since he also claims only 5% of individual’s taxes will go up) since they have a revenue of <$250k.  Does the Small Business Administration’s official government definition of what constitutes a small business agree?  In a word: NO.

The SBA caps different industries at various levels.  Some industries are defined by revenues and the max revenue you can make and still be “small” is between 750,000 – 35.5 Million dollars.  Other industries are capped by employees (100-1500) instead of revenues so we will have to do some payroll math. To stay under Obama’s magic 250 line workers could only earn $1.25/hr in industries that max out at 100 employees, while in industries where the cap is 1500 they could only be paid 8.3 cents an hour.

Now here’s a dirty secret that Obama doesn’t want you to realize: since the tax rate is based on revenues and not profit, it matters little how much the owner decides to take home at the end of the day.  But if expenses are going up in one area of the business they have to go down somewhere else (whither its to keep the boss’ paycheck the same or keep the company in the black)… The easiest place to cut expenses? That would be employee payroll.  So remember that when you’re voting to screw the rich SOB making over $250k… its really Joe employee that will take it on the chin.

Worse still than the truth about the Obama’s tax plan is the apparent reason for it that slipped out during the exchange:  Obama said that while he didn’t “want to punish your success” he did want to “spread the wealth around” because “it’s good for everybody.”  (everybody except those whose wealth is being spread around I suppose)

It’s this socialist slip that generated a firestorm aftermath aimed to distract voters from Obama’s answer by smearing the man who merely posed a are-you-going-to-raise-my-taxes question.  Some snippets from the news:

BRIAN WILLIAMS: (dramatic music) What do we know about this plumber named Joe?

JOHN BERMAN:  It doesn’t actually appear he’s a licensed plumber, and, it does appear there are some issues about past taxes.  There are records of a tax lean filed against Joe!

WYATT ANDREWS:  The man whose personal story steered a presidential debate over taxes, owes some $1,200 in back taxes.

DAVID “RODHAM” GERGEN:  When we found out he was Sam the Non-plumber, it changed a little bit. (snicker) Why the McCain team didn’t vet the guy…

ROLAND MARTIN:  Joe, you know, the fake plumber…

CHRISTOPHER HAYES:  There’s this tremendous gap between the mythical creature of Joe the Plumber and the actual real-life guy, and we see this time and time again.  Sarah Palin is a perfect example.

ANDERSON COOPER:  Joe is not actually a licensed plumber.  He admits he’s not making anywhere close to a quarter million.  His name is actually not Joe; at least that’s not his first name.  His name is Sam: Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher.

My personal favorite is Anderson Cooper’s insinuation of the seediness of someone -gasp- that goes by their middle name! Many are now calling Joe a “McCain plant” which as Ed Morrissey points out is laughable:

 Someone has linked him to the long-deceased Charles Keating, suggesting that somehow Obama managed to pick a McCain plant out of a ropeline full of people by accident.

Really if you listen to Joe’s mid-exchange comment, you will correctly identify him as someone that is in favor of a flat/fair tax system not a well placed flunky.  Perhaps hoping a thoughtful question would increase the chances of a flat/fair tax system under Obama.  (Last time I check McCain couldn’t care less about a a flat or fair tax system.)

Obama & Biden both took stabs at Joe the would be plumbing business owner:

OBAMA: “How many plumbers you know that are making a quarter-million dollars a year?” (video-obama-mocks-joe-the-plumber-crowd-laughs)

Funny, I’m pretty sure that Obama understood (since he was there) that it was a plumbing business with revenues of over 250k… but this really just shows that Obama is intentionally trying to confuse the issue of business revenues verses “rich” people paychecks.

BIDEN: “I don’t have any Joe the Plumbers in my neighborhood…” (biden-video)

So is that an admission of Sen. Joe being healthily separated from the masses or a slam on Plumber Joe?..

One other insight:  Several people have tried to make Obama sound like Robin Hood.  But Robin didn’t steal from the rich and give to the poor, he stole from a corrupt government that over-taxed everyone resulting in everyone except government officials becoming poor and gave the tax money back to the people.

The truly interesting thing is that Obama doesn’t seem interested in distancing himself from the “spread the wealth around” philosophy – just attacking those who disagree with it.